![]() ![]() Any company introducing as relatively unsafe and inefficient a beast as the original Impala today - assuming it could get past governmental regulators, a virtual impossibility - would probably see sales figures reach the high triple digits - if they were lucky.īut never mind that. To be fair, all manufacturers' cars have come a long way since the late 1950s in virtually every respect. Impala and other examples of the division's models. Considering the fierce competition from a host of companies for every sale and the capital investment involved in tooling up for a new car, it's hard to imagine anyone relying today on the intuitive approaches to determining automotive form and content that still worked well four decades ago.Ĭhevrolet Chief Engineer Harry Barr poses with an This is no criticism of Chevrolet, which, like its rivals, builds "market-driven" cars for 21st century customers, vehicles researched and cliniced to a fare-thee-well before Job One ever rolls off the line. Buyers choose it for a host of good reasons, but passion isn't likely to be one of them. Nowadays, it is applied to a practical midsized four-door sedan with a corporate V-6 engine driving the front wheels, plus a long list of amenities that make it competitive with cars of similar size and appearance. Mockup shows how the Chevrolet look evolved.įorty-three years after making its debut, the Chevrolet Impala survives. Chevrolet had scheduled a complete makeover of its cars for 1958 little would be carried over from the strong-selling 1955-1957 versions save powerplants and some model names.Ī comparison of a 1957 Chevrolet (left) and a 1958 ![]() The development of the 1958 Chevrolet Impala could not have come at a more opportune time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |